Home | Blog | Editor's Rants, Raves & Opinions | Does Diving Need a Minimum Fitness Standard For Dive Pros?

Does Diving Need a Minimum Fitness Standard For Dive Pros?

image

This is an opinion piece, the views expressed are solely those of the author and are not necessarily indicative of the views of SEADUCTION.com or its principles.

This debate pops up occasionally, but unfortunately never seriously, within the diving industry. Should diving professionals, (divemasters, dive cons, assistant instructors, instructors and instructor trainers) be required to maintain some minimal level of fitness? This issue is not a cosmetic one, though granted, it is less than appealing to see 300 pounds of quivering flesh wrapped in a Speedo or sealed in a dive skin. Rather, it is a matter of safety. Can an overweight and out-of-shape diving professional respond to an emergency in a safe and effective manner?

How sad would it be for a diver to drown on the surface, 50 meters behind the boat, simply because his divemaster/instructor could not reach the diver in a reasonable time frame? Unfortunately, this is a real risk and one made more apparent to me as I travel and dive from charter boats around the world. Based on my observations, the fitness state of diving pros is appalling, especially in the U.S. and Caribbean. Perhaps, this is not surprising since CNN recently reported that 60 percent of all Americans are overweight.

Although this seems to be a “largely” an American problem, it is not a problem without recognition in the rest of the world. Take for example the program being conducted at the German Sports University in Cologne, Germany. My friend and former colleague, Professor Tobias Dräger, and his team have taken a scientific approach to quantifying how poor fitness contributes to dive accidents and injuries. The study results are interesting and have led to the development of a fitness-testing program that researchers would like to see implemented as a minimum standard for certification in Europe.

That’s right: they are talking about a minimum fitness standard for divers. Yet currently in the U.S. and in many other places around the world, we do not even have a minimum fitness standard for diving instructors. So I have to ask: Why don’t we have a recertification process that would require every instructor to complete a swim test either annually or at least every two years? Every time the idea of a fitness standard comes up, training agencies are resistant to it because they are convinced that a lazy multitude of instructors will defect. If a fitness standard has any hope of taking hold, all major agencies would have to adopt it (otherwise all the instructors would migrate to the agency(ies) more focused on an easy buck).  But to the best of my knowledge, there is only one U.S. training agency that has moved in this direction by providing a specific fitness level standard, IANTD, and even that is a pretty basic standard. In lieu of annual testing by another dive professional, IANTD instructors can be certified fit by a physician or provide an affidavit of a regular fitness program.  Perhaps they have not yet gone far enough, but they certainly have made a step in the right direction.

The need for a fitness standard should be apparent to anyone who spends time near a training pool. I personally have seen an instructor trainer from the Midwest who, even though he had been recently certified as an instructor trainer (less than 6 weeks prior) could not swim one lap in the swimming pool and literally had to be rescued. I recently saw another instructor who required assistance from the boat’s divemaster to walk with a single scuba tank the grueling 10 feet to the back of the boat! The same instructor had to stop to catch her breath three times between her car and the boat; a trip she made four times in order to avoid carrying all of her dive gear at once. (Note: this was regular recreational gear and the gear package did not include scuba tanks, which were provided by the charter operator. However, I do think she had about 50 pounds of lead on her belt.)

Almost as bad as the grossly obese dive pro is the instructor whose proper height-to-weight ratio allows him or her to masquerades as a diver with a level of basic fitness that he or she simply does not possess. I note the fit looking instructor I assisted two weeks ago getting back to a boat in the grueling 0-knot current of the flat calm waters in Crystal River, Florida. I simply advised him to stand up.

Whether you do it as a hobby or a full-time profession, teaching or supervising divers carries with it the responsibility to maintain your physical conditioning, your water skills, and your knowledge of safe diving procedures. If you’re not willing to accept all of these responsibilities, it’s time to turn in your instructor c-card. Your disregard for safety is putting your students and divers at risk and it is hurting our industry.

I also strongly feel that it is time for the industry to step in and make basic fitness a standard, and if instructors walk – good riddance. Let’s do something as an industry that will make a real difference in safety. It’s a novel approach, doing something for our customers instead of our lawyers, but it just might make a difference!

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (11 posted):

Saltydog on 2009-11-18 15:45:39
avatar
Just to Stir the pot for discussion!

To be certified as a lifeguard, the person must be able to perform rescue skills to a certain level, swim something in the neighborhood of 400 yards in a specified time limit among other demanding skills to ensure they can respond adequately.
As a dive instructor, rescue diver, Dive master or similar qualifications where you are responsible for responding in conditions that would require a certain amount of fitness to ensure not only you're personal safety, but the safety of the person in need of help, it would seem to be a "no- brainer" prerequesite to meet and maintain such a requirement.
I have seen enough of my share of chain smoking "instructors" to have my doubts if they could respond under strenuous conditions if an event should occur.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Mike Ange on 2009-11-19 03:28:26
avatar
Hey Saltydog,
Love the accurate and on point analogies. Interestingly enough the instructor base seems strangely silent on this issue. Maybe the topic is hitting to clase to home.

Safe Diving,
Mike A
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Lee Wheeler on 2009-11-24 12:58:57
avatar
To add to the scare, the number of divemaster/instructors I see SMOKING CIGARETTES, on the boat no less, truely frightens me. Lung barotrauma and or embolism probabilities must skyrocket in divers who do this, particularly if they smoke just before a deep dive.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Walker on 2009-12-16 07:29:24
avatar
Just saw this posting and I agree that it would be good to do annual fitness tests but I know that PADI does require timed swims and rescue skills at first to be certified as a divemaster or instructor... Though I surely agree that many people let this lapse. And being that I am a divemaster I see many out of shape divers, instructors, and both that smoke. Smoking doesn't make you more at risk for barotrauma or embolism but at more of a risk of hypoxia and a sedentary lifestyle (though I know some instructors who smoke like fire and still could swim a mile in a good time).
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Carmine on 2010-01-29 21:46:56
avatar
I agree wholeheartedly on a fitness standard. We, as instructors, have to be able to assist the client with equipment, perform skills professionally, and be in a fit enough shape to perform the inevitable rescue. Aside from that, who wants to take a scuba lesson from a fat, winded, out of shape dive instructor? Where is the sales appeal in that? Does anyone think they can get referrals if they appear unhealthy? Probably not. In order to lead and set the example our fitness is of the utmost importance. We should require annual dive physicals of instructors.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
Blades Robinson on 2010-02-23 16:00:44
avatar
Mike,

I only recently became aware of your article and wanted to point out that Dive Rescue International (DRI) requires students to re-certify every three years. Part of the recertification process is completion of the IADRS Watermanship Test (found online at: http://iadrs.org/index.php?pr=DOWNLOADS_AND_LINKS ).

Dive Rescue International instructors must also complete the same test, every three years.

The IADRS Watermanship Test has a passing score where the minimum is 13 METS. While many training agencies are trying to "dumb down" Dive Rescue International, and apparently IANTD are truly concerned for diver safety. Kudos to the IANTD!

Blades Robinson, Director
Dive Rescue International
www.DiveRescueIntl.com
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Pete Robinson on 2010-02-23 20:41:47
avatar
Claiming that a passing score of 13 METS is required. Does Blades he not understand what a METS is therefore how can he say DRI instructors maintain a passing score of 13 METS? Also, having read the I.A.D.R.S. Annual Watermanship Test, there is nothing that indicates a METS score requirement.

On the other hand, Blades meant to say, the instructors are required to maintain a passing score of 13, based on the I.A.D.R.S. test, that makes much more sense.

Not that it matters, but a minimum passing score is 12, and DRI instructors are held to a standard of 13, doesn’t seem like much of a standard.
What is a MET?
One MET, or metabolic equivalent, represents an average person’s resting metabolism or oxygen uptake. As you go through your daily life, most tasks require an energy expenditure that is less than three times resting level, or three METs. METs offer a quick screening measure in evaluating your cardiovascular fitness: A way for you to keep tabs on how much intensity you’re bringing to your workout.

If you do not have access to a treadmill with a METs calculator, you can estimate your intensity by the activity. For example, walking a 20-minute mile is equivalent to 3.5 METs; walking a 12-minute mile is 8 METs.

What’s the right METs value for you? An easy calculation of target METs is the same regardless of weight, but is adjusted for age.

Women: 14.7 – (0.13 x age in years)
Men: 14.7 – (0.11 x age in years)
EXAMPLE:
62-year-old woman:
14.7 – 8.06 = 6.64 target METs
42-year-old woman:
14.7 – 5.46 = 9.24 target METs
22-year-old woman:
14.7 – 2.86 = 11.84 target METs

When exercising, achieving your METs or higher indicates very good to excellent cardiovascular fitness; achieving less is indicative of diminished fitness.

You can boost your fitness level no matter where you are today by consistently walking at a pace that challenges your body by speeding your heart rate and breathing. As you increase your fitness level, you will be able to maintain higher MET readings. For example, if during your initial weeks of training you walk at a pace of 4 METs and felt quite winded, after six weeks you’ll find that a more manageable pace since your fitness level has increased. It will be time to train at a higher MET level to continue improving and to be working hard enough to feel winded.

Hop on the treadmill, and click on the METs measurement. Find your baseline and track your progress during the coming weeks of winter. As your number increases so will your fitness. You will surprise your walking buddies when you take to the streets when the weather improves.
Therefore, if DRI instructors have to take the test every 3 years, how are they possibly maintaining any sort of METS level? And being that METS are individual based, it is impossible to mandate a METS rating of 13 for passing instructors.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
butch Hendrick on 2010-02-23 21:12:10
avatar
Blades this is another one of those topics that you and I agree on. I too belive there should be a physical and academics standard every two years. The industry will never go for it they can't keep instructors now, the concept of a physical fittness requirement has been shoved off the table for over 20 years. Anyway good luck with your endeavor. You and I should really try to dive togeather one day. be safe
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
John Carney on 2010-02-24 22:41:54
avatar
This post is from one of the co-authors of the IADRS Watermanship Test. The test does not DIRECTLY measure METS as Blades inferred. In the '90s military research demonstrated that a pool swim evolution could very well correlate to land based test METS levels, and 13 METS in fitness was the agreed upon cut for divers. Swim testing was also shown to have another advantage, and that was confirming diver comfort in the water. The IADRS test was designed to provide task-based criteria that build to a 13-MET cardiovascular workload. We are aware ref Mr. Robinson's posting above that MET and VO2Max capability diminshes as one ages; however we as Public Safety Scuba professionals also understand our taskings do not diminish...ever - the hydrostatic nature of the water column and environment in which we must operate does not "age adjust". The same holds true for all diving markets. Divers Alert Network has many times confirmed even sport divers should be able to achieve a 13-MET level of fitness. That is the MINIMUM fitness level we must possess. There are other taskings in our PSD market that probably require at times even higher levels of fitness and comfort in the water, as with "GO" rescues during swiftwater deployments. We have found historically that those individuals who oppose or criticize this criteria and testing are divers who know in their hearts (pardon the pun) that they are at issue. Considering the #1 fatality cause in our PSD diving market is heart related incidents, I recommend those individuals do an honest introspective as to the risk/benefit of their life's philosphies.
My Best, John.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Blades Robinson on 2010-02-25 02:18:44
avatar
John, thank you for your more precise explanation of the IADRS Watermanship Test and how you and Fred Jackson designed the passing score of 12 points to CORRELATE to a 13 MET level.

The bottom line is Dive Rescue International utilizes a test to evaluate the fitness level of divers and instructors.

Blades Robinson
Dive Rescue International
www.DiveRescueIntl.com
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Post your comment comment
Please enter the code you see in the image:
  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
  • Plain text Plain text
Tags
Rate this article
5.00